f_157611

R.I.P.D.

on July 21 | in MOVIE REVIEWS | by | with No Comments

Summary:

I’ll be about the one thousandth critic to compare this film to “Men In Black” and “Ghostbusters” – congrats to me –  but I was surprised by the shades of “Beetlejuice” and “Ghost” that filled out the rest of Robert Schwentke’s unusually out-of-whack “R.I.P.D”, which, like its “deado” baddies, lacks any soul. This film should’ve been titled “Budget Without a Cause”.

RIPD-Bridges-Reynolds-ParkerI’ve already gone too deep with this review – there’s not much here other than an amalgam of concepts from the aforementioned classics, if pieced together without much regard for anyone that appreciated them. “R.I.P.D” is an aggressively underdeveloped adaptation of a comic book that should have remained in storyboard format – you know the type, there have been plenty of these over the last five years – with a good one-liner here and there, otherwise just a waste of everyone involved.

With its misplaced cast – Ryan Reynolds in a marginally better role than 2011’s “Green Lantern” and Jeff Bridges proving that playing an undead distant relative of Rooster Cogburn certainly won’t garner the same accolades that he received for 2010’s “True Grit” – “R.I.P.D” (Rest In Peace Department, if there’s any confusion about the acronym) feels like one of those big government purchases at the end of the fiscal year in an effort to secure next year’s budget. Unfortunately, it doesn’t work that way in Hollywood.

After Nick (Reynolds), a Boston detective, is murdered in a double-cross by his partner (Kevin Bacon – yes, him too), he’s immediately sent to an ambiguous realm where semi-reincarnated “lawmen” keep the peace between the world of the living and the dead. Or, sort of dead. There are a lot of fancy, expensive visuals to distract us from what anyone – or anything –  is doing, because there are so many inconsistencies that I think the filmmakers decided to go with a smoke-and-mirrors approach rather than a decent script (the mostly crappy dialogue, while giving Reynolds credit for always making me laugh, is the best part of the film).

d779a672e660318835bbdcd9b9ae4704Assigned to old-timer Roy (Bridges), a cartoonish 200-year U.S. Marshal who’s reluctant to take on a new partner, Nick learns how to deal with these “deados” – entities living among humans incognito – the hard way (though apparently, cumin – yes cumin, the spice – is all it takes to “out” them in all their disgusting, mucus-covered glory). What they’re trying to accomplish, which we eventually learn is linked to Nick’s old partner and a bunch of gold claimed from a drug bust, seems less important than the ridiculous antics of the supernatural characters that are continuously introduced and smacked around with the zaniness of “Who Framed Roger Rabbit”. To spice things up, I guess, are the bodies that the otherworldly cops use as their disguises around Earth’s mortals. In the real world, Roy and Nick look like Victoria’s Secret supermodel Marisa Miller and an “old Chinese guy” (played by the prolific James Hong) respectively – couldn’t be a more conspicuous looking duo, though it might have been more interesting if they appeared that way all the time (for at least one obvious reason). It’s a failed opportunity for some serious laughs.

Everything wraps up almost before you know it’s even started, which is actually to the film’s credit considering the bloat that has overcome most of these summer blockbusters. Though there are some fun, even funny moments, there’s really nothing inventive about “R.I.P.D”, which never gets past its own stupidity. This is a film that, despite some fancy effects, feels about ten years too late. In its big apocalyptic finale, the finer parts of which you can easily gather from the film’s trailer, it flaunts most of its budget – but also the majority of its flaws.

Pin It

related posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

« »

UA-40701732-2